England v USA
Moderator: Moderators
England v USA
On now - and live stream actually seems to be working fairly well
Latest: 4-0 to US after 16mins
Latest: 4-0 to US after 16mins
- davewilliams
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:36 pm
- gender: Male
- Location: Chelmsford
Re: England v USA
But seriously: 1-13 at HT
- UKLacrosse
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:44 pm
- gender: Male
Re: England v USA
Personally, and with all respect to England U19's, I would prefer to see Team USA going for goal rather than just passing the ball for 3-4 minutes at a time. What do others think?
- UKLacrosse
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:44 pm
- gender: Male
Re: England v USA
Since the England - USA game is poor viewing, let's have another trivia question .... 6 weeks after Bannister broke the 4-minute barrier for the mile with 3:59.4, it was broken again with 3:58.0 .... by who, and where?
Re: England v USA
Apparently in 1999 England u'19s only lost to the USA by 2 goals , are we getting worse or are others getting better ??
Re: England v USA
UKLacrosse wrote:Since the England - USA game is poor viewing, let's have another trivia question .... 6 weeks after Bannister broke the 4-minute barrier for the mile with 3:59.4, it was broken again with 3:58.0 .... by who, and where?
John Landy? Can't remember where
- young_trig
- Moderator
- Posts: 1823
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:44 am
- gender: Male
Re: England v USA
Appreciate you're bored, but what's the score?
Re: England v USA
Badger23 wrote:Apparently in 1999 England u'19s only lost to the USA by 2 goals , are we getting worse or are others getting better ??
Correct - 13-11 in the semi-final - though they had already beaten us 22-3 in the round robin.
I don't think this England squad is anywhere near as good as the '99 team, which was arguably the best squad England have ever fielded at either U-19 or senior level. The semi-final in '99 was an amazing game, played in nasty wet and windy conditions in Adelaide. England were 1-4 down at quarter-time before unbelievably winning the 2nd quarter 4-0, and leading 6-4 early in the 3rd before the US went on a 7-goal run, leading 11-7 at three-quarter time. USA went 12-7 up before England scored 4 in a row to trail 11-12 with 6 minutes left. The US got another with 3 minutes to go and then played keep ball to hold on for the win. So close!
Re: England v USA
young_trig wrote:Appreciate you're bored, but what's the score?
Final: 20-1
QT: 4-0
HT: 13-1
TT: 19-1
Lewis Curtis scored England's goal
Mike Connor made 18 saves in the 1st Half to keep it just about respectable
The US scored their 20th goal early in the 4th Q then went into stall mode and barely went to goal at all
Last edited by orange05 on Sun Jul 15, 2012 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: England v USA
Who was in the 99 team ?
- UKLacrosse
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:44 pm
- gender: Male
Re: England v USA
orange05 wrote:UKLacrosse wrote:Since the England - USA game is poor viewing, let's have another trivia question .... 6 weeks after Bannister broke the 4-minute barrier for the mile with 3:59.4, it was broken again with 3:58.0 .... by who, and where?
John Landy? Can't remember where
Turku ... where else?
Re: England v USA
Badger23 wrote:Who was in the 99 team ?
Goal - Wil Stelfox, Nick Anderton
Def - Andrew Linton, Tom Hall, Chris Hart, Simon Jordan, Nathan Singleton, Nick Gilmore
Mid - Dave Bryant, Carl Guest, Mark Reynolds, Anthony Murphy, Jonathan Aspinall, Jon Mountney, Dave Hindson, Andy Duncan, Dave Middleton-Egan, Danny Duncombe
Att - Chris Mountney, Tommy Foster, James Perrin, Richard Wilson, Chris Fitzgerald
UKLacrosse wrote:Turku ... where else?
Doh!
- UKLacrosse
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:44 pm
- gender: Male
Re: England v USA
orange05 wrote:Badger23 wrote:Apparently in 1999 England u'19s only lost to the USA by 2 goals , are we getting worse or are others getting better ??
Correct - 13-11 in the semi-final - though they had already beaten us 22-3 in the round robin.
I don't think this England squad is anywhere near as good as the '99 team, which was arguably the best squad England have ever fielded at either U-19 or senior level. The semi-final in '99 was an amazing game, played in nasty wet and windy conditions in Adelaide. England were 1-4 down at quarter-time before unbelievably winning the 2nd quarter 4-0, and leading 6-4 early in the 3rd before the US went on a 7-goal run, leading 11-7 at three-quarter time. USA went 12-7 up before England scored 4 in a row to trail 11-12 with 6 minutes left. The US got another with 3 minutes to go and then played keep ball to hold on for the win. So close!
A true reflection of that squad is that many of them are still some of the best players in the UK!
- mikehmlax6
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:51 am
- gender: Male
Re: England v USA
nice to see the support back home, only ever slag us off when we lose how about giving us a bit of slack!
Legally beating men with sticks since 1492
Pain is Temporary - Glory is forever
If they don't play Lacrosse in heaven, I'm not goin
you miss 100% of the shots you never take
Pain is Temporary - Glory is forever
If they don't play Lacrosse in heaven, I'm not goin
you miss 100% of the shots you never take
- Moaning Git
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:46 pm
- gender: Male
Re: England v USA
Mike, I can't see anyone slagging off the England team at all. If comments are made. for example, mine about the number of penalties in the Oz game, they are legitimate statements. Comparing a previous team achievements with a current team is not slagging off, it is nostalgia.
The England squad are playing hard, and keeping up the fight even when victory has slipped well out of sight. That indicates character but does not in anyway detract from the reality that shows the skills gap between the top three teams and England and Australia is massive, while the gap between those two teams and the rest is also large, the question is whether that second gap is closing at all.
I am proud of the spirit shown by the England team, I am sorry that we have nothing like the resources, infrastructure, and sheer volume of players that the USA squad can call on. That is not slagging anyone off.
The England squad are playing hard, and keeping up the fight even when victory has slipped well out of sight. That indicates character but does not in anyway detract from the reality that shows the skills gap between the top three teams and England and Australia is massive, while the gap between those two teams and the rest is also large, the question is whether that second gap is closing at all.
I am proud of the spirit shown by the England team, I am sorry that we have nothing like the resources, infrastructure, and sheer volume of players that the USA squad can call on. That is not slagging anyone off.
Re: England v USA
nice one for the support fellas... its nice to know everyone sat at home are rooting for us! really helps all of us out here, who are trying our best to do you all proud!
Re: England v USA
Well put MG - references to '99 were meant in vein of "Keep you heads up, anything can happen"!
We're all behind England 100% but recognize how tough it is at this level
And GREAT win over the Aussies lads - one for the grandkids to hear about...!!
We're all behind England 100% but recognize how tough it is at this level
And GREAT win over the Aussies lads - one for the grandkids to hear about...!!
Re: England v USA
Where did the 99 team finish was it higher than 4 th?
Re: England v USA
Nope, lost 11-16 to very good Iroquois team in 3rd place play-off