Festival Thoughts
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:48 pm
I spent a week at the Euros as a Festival Ref and thought I would share a few thoughts.
First I was disappointed so few UK teams took part in the Festival, I think you missed out on a fun event, and also the fact that you were not there took the competitive edge from the Festival. All credit to Bristol Uni though for their participation, good humour and competitiveness especially against the US based teams.
So a question . Why did so few UK teams compete? I have a feeling that the length of the festival and the associated costs might be the main reason, is that the case?
As I ref I ended up working a lot harder than I imagined, having to cover as least 6 x 40 minute games a day in high heat and humidity. But probably the most challenging aspect was refing at different standards to suit the games. Some of the Festival teams were there for the craich, complete with cow v Pikachu or goalie ve goalie, or backwards faceoffs; others though were there for some top level lacrosse, having paid many thousands of pounds to take part, or as with the Jerusalem team having something to prove. This was certainly not easy, but in the end I think the refing team which included officials of all standards and from Europe, North America and Australia did a good job despite problems arising.
During the Festival I saw precious little of the full international games as I was working until 6pm, but I was able to spectate during Friday evening and all day Saturday. I spent quite a bit of time sat with the Irish contingent having met the guys from the Eire team at camp. They were fantastic company and the supporters were consistently behind their teams, urging them on and always in a positive way. During the final I only heard one anti English comment, and that from a drunken Yank who could hardly stand up!
Unfortunately there was one disgraceful incident of racism during the week when some moron decided to draw swastikas an Israeli team area. I am proud to say that this action was universally condemned by players, officials, and organisers. There is no place for racism in Lacrosse.
The Israeli teams competing in the Euros had a very high degree of support, commitment, and ability, and with the financial resources they have available I have no doubt that they will soon have a major impact on the European rankings.
Overall, I think that the Euros were a great event to be part of and I enjoyed myself and made a number of friends. That said there were problems in the organisation that need to be considered and avoided in the future. I was very impressed by the way in which the organisers sought to promote the sport nationally and to use the event as a springboard to develop Lacrosse in the Netherlands. I think perhaps that in doing so they overextended themselves somewhat and this caused problems in other areas.
Oh yes and I watched Crooked Arrows, and enjoyed it!
First I was disappointed so few UK teams took part in the Festival, I think you missed out on a fun event, and also the fact that you were not there took the competitive edge from the Festival. All credit to Bristol Uni though for their participation, good humour and competitiveness especially against the US based teams.
So a question . Why did so few UK teams compete? I have a feeling that the length of the festival and the associated costs might be the main reason, is that the case?
As I ref I ended up working a lot harder than I imagined, having to cover as least 6 x 40 minute games a day in high heat and humidity. But probably the most challenging aspect was refing at different standards to suit the games. Some of the Festival teams were there for the craich, complete with cow v Pikachu or goalie ve goalie, or backwards faceoffs; others though were there for some top level lacrosse, having paid many thousands of pounds to take part, or as with the Jerusalem team having something to prove. This was certainly not easy, but in the end I think the refing team which included officials of all standards and from Europe, North America and Australia did a good job despite problems arising.
During the Festival I saw precious little of the full international games as I was working until 6pm, but I was able to spectate during Friday evening and all day Saturday. I spent quite a bit of time sat with the Irish contingent having met the guys from the Eire team at camp. They were fantastic company and the supporters were consistently behind their teams, urging them on and always in a positive way. During the final I only heard one anti English comment, and that from a drunken Yank who could hardly stand up!
Unfortunately there was one disgraceful incident of racism during the week when some moron decided to draw swastikas an Israeli team area. I am proud to say that this action was universally condemned by players, officials, and organisers. There is no place for racism in Lacrosse.
The Israeli teams competing in the Euros had a very high degree of support, commitment, and ability, and with the financial resources they have available I have no doubt that they will soon have a major impact on the European rankings.
Overall, I think that the Euros were a great event to be part of and I enjoyed myself and made a number of friends. That said there were problems in the organisation that need to be considered and avoided in the future. I was very impressed by the way in which the organisers sought to promote the sport nationally and to use the event as a springboard to develop Lacrosse in the Netherlands. I think perhaps that in doing so they overextended themselves somewhat and this caused problems in other areas.
Oh yes and I watched Crooked Arrows, and enjoyed it!